REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 300-303 OF 2017
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.6117-6120 of 2015)
STATE OF KARNATAKA … … APPELLANT(S)
:Versus:
SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 304-307 OF 2017
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.6294-6297 of 2015)
K. ANBAZHAGAN … … APPELLANT(S)
:Versus:
SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS. ETC. … RESPONDENT(S)
AND
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.308-313 OF 2017
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.6121-6126 of 2015)
K. ANBAZHAGAN … … APPELLANT(S)
:Versus:
INDO DOHA CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS
AND ORS. ETC. … … RESPONDENT(S)
AND
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.314-319 OF 2017
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.7107-7112 of 2015)
2
STATE OF KARNATAKA … … APPELLANT(S)
:Versus:
INDO DOHA CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS
LTD. AND ORS. ETC. … … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals project a challenge to the judgment and
order dated 11.5.2015 rendered by the High Court of Karnatka
in the appeals preferred by the respondents herein, thereby
acquitting them of the charge under Sections 120B and 109 of
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”) read with Sections
13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
(for short “1988 Act”) as framed against them and also
resultantly setting-aside the order of the Trial Court for
confiscation of properties, both movable and immovable, of
3
the concerned firms, as mentioned therein. In the meantime,
after the conclusion of the arguments, the respondent No.1
expired and, thus in law, the appeals against her have abated.
Nevertheless, in view of the gamut of the imputations and the
frame-work of the charges as well as the nature of the
evidence, oral and documentary, available on records,
reference to her role and involvement, based thereon in
collaboration with other respondents would have to be
essentially examined. The respondents-accused would
hereinafter be referred to as respondents/accused/A1/A2/A3/
A4, as the case may be, contingent on the context...........................................
....................................................
TO SEE & DOWNLOAD IN PDF FORMAT -
570 PAGES FULL CASE DETAILS COPY OF SUPREME COURT
